The Energy
Medicine Institute

The Energy Medicine Handout Bank About the Bank Featured Articles Latest Articles All Articles

Energy Medicine
Case Histories

Health Q & A’s
from an
Energy Medicine

View Free Issues
Energy Community Report

Download the First
Energy Medicine

Energy Medicine Books & Videos available at Energy Medicine Books & Videos

Energy Medicine
Foundation Classes
Program Details

Energy Medicine
Certification Program

Energy Medicine

Other Energy
Medicine Resources
Energy Medicine Directory

Energy Psychology
An Exciting New
Specialty within
Energy Medicine

Energy Psychology
Books & Videos

EMI Activities
in Behalf of
Energy Psychology

Energy Medicine
A Career
for the Future

to The Energy Medicine Institute

For Immediate Release

Printable Version (pdf)

For inquiries about a feature story or to set up an interview bringing this controversy to public light, please contact: Dondi Dahlin

Is the American Psychological Association Blocking
the Most Effective Treatments for PTSD?

In the wake of enormous controversy about its role in the participation of psychologists in the use of torture to extract information from prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and in other parts of the world, a new round of criticism has been directed toward the American Psychological Association (APA). Growing numbers of highly regarded mental health professionals are expressing concern that the APA is actively blocking therapists from learning techniques that have been shown to be highly effective in helping people who suffer with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related conditions. The APA’s 11-year policy, which bans psychologists from receiving continuing education credit for studying the approach, known as “Energy Psychology,” was recently re-affirmed after being challenged by the international Association for Comprehensive Energy Psychology (ACEP). ACEP is comprised of 850 practitioners and researchers who are adapting techniques from time-tested healing disciplines such as acupuncture and yoga to assist with a wide range of psychological issues.

According to Pennsylvania psychologist, Carole Stern, ACEP’s President-elect, “As disheartening as it has been for us as psychologists to realize that our professional organization did not take immediate and decisive ethical steps with members who participated in the government’s use of torture, the harm being done by the APA’s position here is actually much more far-reaching. Some 5 million people in the United States suffer with PTSD, including more than 300,000 veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. PTSD is a debilitating and agonizing affliction, and the early evidence is showing Energy Psychology to be much quicker and more effective than existing treatments. To block therapists from learning it is unconscionable.”

ACEP has been actively attempting to get the APA to lift its ban for more than a decade. Because emerging research on Energy Psychology supports ACEP’s position, the controversy has been gaining increasing attention. Studies using the method with individuals suffering from PTSD have shown striking outcomes. As a result, the method is finding its way into conventional health care settings and receiving growing popular attention. More than a million people have obtained a guide book for using Energy Psychology on a self-help basis, and clinical trials are being conducted by Kaiser Permanente, Walter Reed, and Britain’s National Health Service.

ACEP’s current President, Gregory J. Nicosia, a psychologist and an APA member since 1977, notes: “The APA’s criteria for appropriate CE content are clear and straightforward. By any reasonable reading of our applications or of our 80-page appeal brief, we have met these criteria many times over. In blocking the dissemination of this approach, the APA is following a different agenda than its own rules. I have no idea what that agenda might be, but the bottom line is that it is hampering one of the most important clinical interventions for treating trauma that has appeared in recent years from reaching those who are in desperate need and could benefit from it most.”

Clinical psychologists are increasingly speaking out about being actively blocked by their own professional organization from learning or promoting the approach. In a recent interview, California psychologist and ethics expert David Gruder stated: “The [APA] should be shouting from the rooftops about this new clinical development. Instead it has persisted for over a decade in putting up roadblocks.” Read the entire interview with Dr. Gruder.


Additional background information and research citations.          Printable Version (pdf)

For questions or to arrange an interview with a leading practitioner of Energy Psychology, contact:

Dondi Dahlin
Energy Medicine Institute
777 East Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
541-482-1800 ext. 1

How You Can Help You can spread the word about this by forwarding this page to: * Media contacts you know who might be interested in this story * Editors of mental health and/or veterans newsletters * Psychologists you know who see the value of EP methods. (Or download and attach the pdf version of this story so you can include it in emails you send to these folks.)

Home   Handout Bank   Energy Medicine Q & A’s   Energy Community Report
Contribute to the Energy Medicine Institute    Energy Psychology

The Energy Medicine Institute
777 East Main Street  –  Ashland, OR 97520
(541) 482-1800
* ]]> *
Design, Development, Hosting, and Maintenance by The CyberSide & Co.
All contents copyright © The Energy Medicine Institute, 2001-2017. All rights reserved.